:

News By You

The March of Dimes is looking for members of the c (Wednesday, March 24 2010)
0 Comments // 1175 Reads
Fauquier Freeze 16U - White is looking for players (Wednesday, January 6 2010)
0 Comments // 2000 Reads
There will be a New year's Day 5k run, 5k walk and (Sunday, December 20 2009)
0 Comments // 1830 Reads
Jinan Biobase Biotech Co., Ltd. is a professional (Thursday, November 26 2009)
0 Comments // 2099 Reads

"The Angry Mob"

In recent days and through the rest of August, Congress is on recess. As we have seen in town hall meetings across the country people are angry, yelling, and confronting Congress on America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009. Many members of Congress and media outlets have been trying to portray these angry people as mobs working for the large insurance companies or right wing groups. Whether or not these people are simply grassroots or influenced by larger groups, I believe this characterization is very hypocritical and insulting. Democrats who characterize these people as groups also need to remember a key part of their own strategy that gained back the White House and won them a majority in Congress. President Obama and Democrats have received large support from similar "angry" people who have protested and spoke out against the Iraq War and other Bush policies. The Democrats relied on core beliefs \ such as their position against the Iraq war \ to incite anger and spark a grassroots network. Barack Obama, in several campaign speeches has said, "I don't want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I'm angry."

In another speech on September 18, 2008 he told supporters, "I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face." Republicans as a result faced many tough questions from both protest groups and honest concerned citizens.

In a complete 180, Democrats are now facing some of the same types of anger and tough questions that they had once used to reinvigorate their own party. Now the Democrat majority is facing similar groups
\ core conservatives that are standing up against their own beliefs. To belittle opponents by arguing they are on the payroll of huge health insurance agencies or they are wealthy Americans dressed to look like the middle class, is absurd. Many of those people are coming to voice their opinion and ask tough questions.

I understand that the Iraq War and health insurance reform are two very different subjects and, on both sides, individuals and groups have gone to extreme lengths, which neither party is truly inciting. However, for the DNC chairman to make a statement that Republican groups that are encouraging people to "stand up and shout and try to rattle lawmakers to prevent them from talking peacefully with their constituents" as unethical and an attempt to intimidate lawmakers needs to be rethought. Considering that their party employed many of the same tactics.

There is other evidence of hypocrisy among Democrats trying to combat the "intimidation" of people by political groups. Recently it was reported that the Obama Justice Department "voluntarily dropped a civil complaint against the New Black Panther Party after members intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs, and night sticks, another member who was an approved election official is seen managing, directing, and endorsing their behavior." This is an example of intimidation and unacceptable behavior and intimidation. This type of behavior is what needs to be criticized and prosecuted, not partisan saber rattling.

Bennett Opitz

Flint Hill

You must be logged in to post a comment.